RAND MINING DISTRICT "COOPERATION"
& MMAC INQUIRY & FINDINGS
PUBLIC NOTICE
Due to the special position and establishment of Jefferson Mining
District, together with its 4 years experience in Coordination, 43
USC 1712, and compelled by representations made in an article
published by Scott Harn, of ICMJ, reporting on the activities of Joe
Martori regarding activating a yet to be formed Rand Mining District
and his unilateral inclusion of a mining district as a Cooperating
Agency, 43 USC ยง 4321, 40 CFR 1501, 43 CFR Part 46, etc., under the
Secretary of the Interior, Jefferson Mining District Assembly
commissioned, prepared, and served the following line of inquiry and
findings upon Joe Martori.
This Line of Inquiry evidences, and is admitted, that Joe Martori,
or the MMAC have no lawful authority to commit a non-existent mining
district unilaterally to agency servitude through "Round Table" or
other Cooperative Agency status, such as "administrative mining
districts". These promoted bureaucratic "administrative mining
districts" are unknown to the customs, traditions, and culture of
miners. The eventual Rand mining district or any congressionally
acknowledged miner's government would be ill-advised to accept such
a weakened capacity; and,
That neither do the MMAC or, as a project of, the legal entity
Public Lands for the People, PLP, have any lawful authority to
determine or "outline" or limit or control anything about a mining
district pursuant to the Act of 1872, amending the prior
congressional Acts acknowledging mining districts;
The consequent Final Findings: Propriety of actions of Joe Martori
with regard to Rand mining district & MMAC,
showing Cooperating Agency status does not provide more power
to the grantee than the grantee, or the power Congress already
acknowledges to those assembled through mining districts established
free of MMAC, or Much More Administrative Control,
and bureaucratic overburden; and,
That none of these legal entities, or the attorneys they will rely
on, see Jefferson
Mining District, et. al., v. Kitzhaber, et. al.,
2013, can or will protect a mineral estate grantee no matter how
attractive the proposed added agency bureaucratic package promoted
appears; and,
As More Fully Documented and Explained Through the Following
Documents:
Initiating
Letter of Inquiry to Joe Martori on Behalf of Rand Mining
District
The
Courtesy Followup Communication Because of the Default of Joe
Martori to Respond
The
Final Finding Based Upon the Facts, the Law, and By Default
Agreement of Joe Martori That His Actions and Those of MMAC,
or Others Aiding and Abetting, Are Not Warranted and Are in
Conflict With Law
In Further Disclosure
Jefferson Mining District has redrawn the original MMAC Flow-chart
to disclose what MMAC, Joe Martori, ICMJ, or PLP will not fully
disclose with regard to operable law as it will actually affect the
mineral estate grantee. That no matter how this bureaucratic
oppression is painted it cannot serve the mineral estate grantee
better or more immediately than existing law and the grantee taking
responsibility to effect it.
MMAC
Flow-chart Correcting Prior Omissions To Disclosure Based on
The Final Findings and the Law
All of Which Deception Is Exposed Prior Through:
The
MMAC Offer Rejection Order Explaining The Method and Source
of Law Used to Steal Property and Rights from Grantees
by MMAC, It's Proposed Legislation, and Those Aiding and
Abetting Such Deceit.
Please Take Note:
The Method above exposed is designed and used to steal your Power
and to falsely claim representative capacity over your property
and your rights without your actual consent, no matter what it is
called or how it is constructed. The law states that any one or
any body taking or gaining control of your property or your rights
under color of authority without lawful warrant the
conduct is felony theft by extortion and felony conversion.